This post is also on: Português English
The Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra is one of the most important historical landmarks in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, and is also known for housing the iconic Barra Lighthouse (Farol da Barra). This fort has a rich history tied to the defense of the city, the colonial period, and navigation.
A brief history of the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra
1. Origins and Construction
- 16th Century: Construction of the Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra began in 1534, making it one of the first forts built in Brazil, shortly after the arrival of the Portuguese. Initially, it was a rudimentary structure made of rammed earth and wood, designed to defend the entrance to the Bay of All Saints (Baía de Todos os Santos) against invaders and pirates.
- Reconstruction in Stone: Between 1583 and 1587, during the governorship of Manuel Teles Barreto, the fort was rebuilt using masonry, transforming it into a more robust and permanent fortress. This reconstruction period gave the fort its approximate current form, with stone walls and an irregular polygon shape adapted to the terrain.
2. Military and Strategic Function
- City Defense: The fort was designed to protect the entrance to the Bay of All Saints, a strategic access point to the city of Salvador. Its elevated location at the farthest point of the peninsula where Salvador is situated allowed a clear view of the sea and any potential threats.
- Barra Lighthouse: In 1698, the first lighthouse in the Americas was installed at the fort, known as the Barra Lighthouse (Farol da Barra), to guide ships arriving on the Bahian coast and marking the entrance to the bay. This lighthouse has been and continues to be, an important aid to maritime navigation.
3. Role in Historical Conflicts
- Dutch Invasions: During the Dutch invasions in the 17th century, particularly in the 1620s and 1630s, the fort played a crucial role in defending Salvador. In 1624, when the Dutch invaded Salvador, the fort aided in the resistance, although the city temporarily fell under Dutch control.
- Independence of Bahia: The fort was also a strategic point during the events leading to the Independence of Bahia in 1823, when Brazilian forces fought to expel the last Portuguese strongholds from Bahian territory.
4. Modifications and Restorations
- 19th Century: Over the centuries, the fort underwent various modifications and upgrades to adapt to new military demands and the evolution of artillery. In 1839, the lighthouse was modernized, and a new cast-iron tower was installed.
- Modern Restoration: Throughout the 20th century, the fort was restored several times to preserve its historical structure and adapt it for cultural and tourist uses. These restorations also aimed to preserve the Barra Lighthouse, a symbol of Salvador.
5. Present Day and Cultural Importance
- Nautical Museum of Bahia: Today, the Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra houses the Nautical Museum of Bahia, where visitors can learn about the history of navigation and explore historical artifacts related to the sea, naval history, and the fort itself.
- Tourism: The Barra Lighthouse is one of the most visited tourist spots in Salvador. From the top of the lighthouse, visitors can enjoy a breathtaking panoramic view of the Bay of All Saints and the Atlantic Ocean, especially at sunset.
- Cultural Events: The fort also hosts various cultural events, including art exhibitions, festivals, and civic celebrations, solidifying its role as a central part of the cultural life of Salvador.
With its long history and continuous function as a guide for sailors and a cultural center, the Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra remains one of the most important landmarks in Salvador, symbolizing the city’s and Brazil’s resilience and maritime history.
Video – History of the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra in Salvador
History of the construction of the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra in Salvador
Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra oe Barra Lighthouse in Salvador is certainly one of the ex-libris of the City of Salvador.
However, none of the other fortifications of the Head of Brazil has undergone so many metamorphoses during its more than four hundred years of existence than the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra.
Although historians do not usually state its exact origins, a very old record of the first construction of this defence can be found in a codex of the Overseas Archives.
It transcribes a charter of 21 May 1598, by which Brito Correia, commander of the Fort of Santo Antônio, was appointed “bastion”, “which is begun in the bar of that City.”
This must be the version that succeeded the polygonal rammed earth tower, according to the Livro Velho do Tombo do Mosteiro de São Bento.
Thus, the historian João da Silva Campos’ assertion that the first fort, i.e. the octagonal tower, was the work of the government of Manoel Teles Barreto (1583-1587) is acceptable.
As was the case with the fortifications of that quarter, it is possible that Saint Antony of Barra was born in the shape of a tower, as depicted by Albernaz.
These figurations must not be random or fanciful, because there is a graphic scale in the drawings. Furthermore, the other three fortifications represented – the Redoubt of Saint Albert, the Forte de Monserrat and the Tower of Saint James of Agua de Meninos – can be confirmed by analysing other iconographies or, in the case of Monserrate, because it still exists.
.From the graphic scale provided, we can assess the size of the axes of the regular octagon represented as about 120 palms (approximately 26 metres).
Like the former stronghold of Saint Albert, the Tower of Agua de Meninos and the Castle of Saint Philip, today’s Our Lady of Montserrat had a high entrance with a staircase and drawbridge, suggesting a typological solution of the period.
As an octagonal tower, the original construction of the Fort of Saint Anthony, seen from afar, could be interpreted as a cylindrical tower.
The problem is that, in this specific case, the shapes used as cartographic decoration may not be contemporary with the cartographic plan or its author, Albernaz, but correspond to older fortresses copied from other prints.
The suspicion is justified by information contained in Diogo Moreno’s report – not only the iconography, dated 1609, but also the following reference in the description of Monserrate Fort: “stone and lime fort of the same design as St Anthony’s […]”.
As can be seen, in Moreno’s drawing there is no octagon, but a hexagon, which really resembles the Fort of Montserrat without the towers.
The entrance remains high and has a drawbridge, but the towers protecting access to the inner perimeter are located on the outside of the curtain wall. The parapets have gunboats, although few.
Judging by the artillery listed in Diogo Moreno’s Livro que dá razão do Estado do Brasil, with four pieces in total, this second version, even if built more durably in stone and lime, must also have been of modest proportions.
According to a report by the military engineer José Antônio Caldas, the curtain wall of the late 17th-century version had sixteen pieces of different calibres by the mid-18th century, in keeping with its enlarged firing line.
Some historians want to attribute some strategic value to this friendly and photogenic fort, but they should not be carried away by the excitement, given the coldness of the facts and the reality of the situation.
From the beginning of the 17th century, Moreno said of him that “every day armed ships of corsairs enter and leave without the artillery that is here doing any damage to it, and even if it has colubrinas [a type of artillery piece] of sixty quintals, it will never be able to fully defend the bar”.
He goes on to describe it as an “adornment of the bar”, and on this we all agree.
The reality is that no expert considered the Fortress of Santo Antônio da Barra to be of great strategic or tactical value.
Diogo Moreno is more than clear when he says: “His Majesty has often been warned that the Forts of Santo Antonio, Itapagipe and Água de Meninos […] are of no use, because they defend nothing, and because of the great risk they run due to their weakness and poor design […]”.
Bernardo Vieira Ravasco, Secretary of State and War, also said in his report of 11 September 1660: “These three forts, being almost together, are of no use to those who attend them […]”.
Even after the substantial reforms at the end of the 17th century, which greatly increased the firepower of the Fort of Saint Anthony of Barra, its prestige did not grow.
In the early 18th century, the field master Miguel Pereira da Costa was also quite emphatic in his opinion of the fort’s inefficiency.
It should be noted that, despite already presenting the current, much more developed form, the fortification did not deserve credit, having as a disadvantage a stepfather, the current Gavazza hill.
The opinion on the limitation of Saint Anthony of Barra is shared even by laymen, such as Friar Vicente do Salvador, who states that this fort and that of Saint Philip (Monserrate) are “more for terror than for effect”.
The improvements of the new project did not solve the problem of the strategic efficiency of the fortress, because they did not help to stop invasions of the city from the south.
It remained a defence with no capacity to harass the enemies who entered the bay. From a tactical point of view, although the perimeter of fire had been increased, the conditions for the defence of its curtains were precarious.
The Batavians took this war square in the invasion of 1624, so as not to leave enemy troops in their rear when they landed in Porto da Barra, but they did not invest in a large garrison to hold it. This is a fact, because soon afterwards the fort was retaken by Francisco Nunes Marinho, at the behest of Matias de Albuquerque.
In fact, it was generally believed among scholars of the capital’s defence that it would be foolhardy to divide the small number of troops to garrison the remote defences of Barra and Montserrat.
However, we cannot ignore the role played by the fortification as a lookout for the bar of the Bay of All Saints, a function for which it had a privileged position.
From this position, since the early days of Ponta do Padrão, ships coming from the north in search of its waters were signalled.
There are several documents mentioning the signals with fires, which travelled along the coast, from the Tatuapara Tower House to Ponta do Padrão, warning of the approach of ships, and the shots that were made from fortress to fortress indicating more than four ships entering the bar.
This function earned our fortress the nickname of Barra Lookout.
The lighthouse installed in the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra, still in the 17th century, for the defence of navigators against the escarpments and shallows of that area of the sea, demonstrates that, more than its warlike function, always in doubt, it could boast those of navigation safety and surveillance.
The installation of the lighthouse in the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra took place in 1698, due to the disaster with the Galeão Sacramento, a vessel that was carrying General Francisco Correia da Silva, who would become governor, but died in the shipwreck.
Veja Wreck of the Galeão Sacramento in Salvador BA.
To fulfil these functions, a square-based lighthouse tower was installed, which survived for a long time.
The current appearance of the fortress is largely the same as it was at the end of the 17th century, except for the expansion of the covered area on the embankment. The cylindrical lighthouse tower dates from the 19th century, since Vilhena still represented it as square at the end of the previous century.
According to Silva Campos, the cylindrical tower must be the result of a renovation arising from the Imperial Order of 6 July 1832, when lighting equipment purchased in England was installed.
New European equipment was installed in 1890 and remodelled in 1904. The electrification of the system dates from 1937.
See Defences of Porto da Barra – Forts of Santa Maria and São Diogo
History of the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra in Salvador – Tourism and Travel Guide of Salvador da Bahia